🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.